Explain the Neumann and Morgenstern's expected utility theory. Discuss how Houthakker and Taylor used the partial adjustment concept to explain the demand function?

Neumann and Morgenstern's Expected Utility Theory

Neumann and Morgenstern's Expected Utility Theory (EUT) is a foundational concept in decision theory, economics, and behavioral science. This theory was introduced in their seminal work Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1944) and provides a formal framework for understanding how individuals make decisions under uncertainty.

The Core of Expected Utility Theory

Expected utility theory is based on the premise that individuals make decisions by considering the possible outcomes of each option and assigning a utility (a measure of satisfaction or value) to these outcomes. Unlike traditional expected value theory, where decisions are based on maximizing the probability-weighted monetary value of outcomes, expected utility theory suggests that individuals care not only about the outcomes but also about the utility derived from those outcomes.

The theory posits that individuals aim to maximize their expected utility, which is calculated by multiplying the utility of each possible outcome by its probability and then summing these values. Mathematically, this is expressed as:

$$EU = \sum_{i=1}^{n} p_i \cdot U(x_i)$$

Where:

• $EU$ is the expected utility,
• $p_i$ is the probability of outcome $i$,
• $U(x_i)$ is the utility derived from outcome $x_i$,
• $n$ represents the number of possible outcomes.

Assumptions of the Theory

Neumann and Morgenstern outlined several key assumptions that underpin expected utility theory:

1. Completeness: Individuals can rank all possible outcomes, meaning they can compare and assign preferences to each.
2. Transitivity: If an individual prefers outcome A to B and B to C, then they must prefer A to C.
3. Independence: If an individual is indifferent between two outcomes, the addition of a third outcome should not affect their preference between the first two.
4. Continuity: Preferences should be continuous, meaning small changes in outcomes should not lead to abrupt shifts in preferences.

The utility function in expected utility theory reflects an individual's attitude toward risk. A risk-averse individual has a concave utility function (they prefer certainty), while a risk-seeking individual has a convex utility function (they prefer riskier options).

Applications of Expected Utility Theory

Expected utility theory is widely applied in economics, particularly in areas involving decision-making under uncertainty, such as insurance, investment, and gambling. It provides a rational framework for explaining how individuals make choices involving probabilistic outcomes, balancing potential risks and rewards.

Houthakker and Taylor's Partial Adjustment Concept

The partial adjustment model is a dynamic model used to explain how economic agents adjust their behavior gradually over time in response to changes in factors like prices or income. This concept was introduced by economists Houthakker and Taylor in their 1970 study of consumer demand functions. Their framework was developed to explain the observed behavior of consumers, who do not adjust their consumption levels instantly in response to changes in prices or other economic variables. Instead, consumers adjust their demand incrementally, in line with changes in prices or income.

The Partial Adjustment Model

The partial adjustment model assumes that consumers do not react instantaneously to changes in economic conditions but instead adjust their behavior slowly, over a period of time. This gradual adjustment reflects both inertia and habit formation in consumer behavior.

Mathematically, the model can be expressed as:

$$\Delta Q_t = \lambda (Q^* - Q_t)$$

Where:

• $\Delta Q_t$ is the change in quantity demanded in period $t$,
• $Q_t$ is the current quantity demanded,
• $Q^*$ is the desired quantity demanded (the long-term equilibrium level),
• $\lambda$ is a parameter between 0 and 1 that represents the speed of adjustment.

In this model, $\lambda$ represents the proportion of the gap between the current demand and the desired demand that is closed in each period. If $\lambda$ is small, the adjustment is slow, while if $\lambda$ is large, the adjustment happens more quickly.

Application to the Demand Function

Houthakker and Taylor applied the partial adjustment concept to explain the demand function by showing that the quantity demanded of a good is not only a function of its current price and income but also depends on past levels of demand. They argued that the consumer’s adjustment to changes in price or income is not immediate; instead, demand adjusts progressively, reflecting habit persistence and adjustment costs.

This approach allows for a more realistic depiction of consumer behavior, especially in markets where consumers take time to adjust to price changes, rather than changing their demand instantly. It also helps explain the phenomenon of price rigidity in some markets, where prices do not adjust immediately to changes in supply and demand.

For example, if the price of a good increases, consumers may not immediately cut back on their consumption. Instead, they will gradually reduce consumption over time, in line with their changing perceptions of the price and its long-term implications for their budget and preferences.

Houthakker and Taylor's Contribution

Houthakker and Taylor's contribution was significant because it incorporated the idea of habit persistence and the slow adjustment of demand into economic theory, moving beyond the static, short-run models of consumer behavior that had dominated prior to their work. The partial adjustment model they developed helps explain demand dynamics more accurately, particularly when consumers face changing prices or income levels over time.

By considering the gradual adjustment in the demand for goods, this model allows for a more nuanced understanding of consumer behavior, as it accounts for time lags and the persistence of past consumption patterns.

Conclusion

In summary, Neumann and Morgenstern's Expected Utility Theory revolutionized decision-making under uncertainty by introducing the idea that individuals maximize expected utility rather than expected monetary value, with utility being a subjective measure of satisfaction. On the other hand, Houthakker and Taylor's partial adjustment model explains consumer demand by introducing a gradual adjustment process, recognizing that consumers do not instantaneously adjust to changes in prices or income. Both theories significantly contribute to economic modeling and provide deeper insights into human behavior, whether it is in the context of risk preferences or how consumers react to economic changes over time.

Subscribe on YouTube - NotesWorld

For PDF copy of Solved Assignment

Any University Assignment Solution

WhatsApp - 9113311883 (Paid)