Type Here to Get Search Results !

Hollywood Movies

Solved Assignment PDF

Buy NIOS Solved TMA 2025-26!

Explain how excess capacity emerge under monopolistic competition. State the major criticisms against the monopolistic competitive market form.

Excess Capacity under Monopolistic Competition

Monopolistic competition is a market structure characterized by many firms selling differentiated products that are close substitutes for one another. This differentiation allows firms to have some degree of market power, meaning they can set prices above marginal cost, unlike in perfect competition. However, monopolistic competition also leads to excess capacity, a situation where firms operate at a level of output that is below their long-run efficient scale, or the quantity that would minimize their average cost.

How Excess Capacity Emerges

Excess capacity arises because firms in monopolistic competition do not achieve productive efficiency (where average cost is minimized) in the long run. In the long-run equilibrium of a monopolistic competitive market:

  1. Product Differentiation: Each firm offers a product that is slightly different from those of its competitors, which gives it some pricing power. Consumers have preferences for these differentiated products, but the differences are not so great that firms can charge significantly higher prices without losing customers. As a result, firms have some monopoly power, but this power is limited by the presence of many competitors.
  2. Demand Curve: Firms face a downward-sloping demand curve for their product, which is relatively elastic because there are close substitutes available. In the long run, firms enter the market if there are profits and exit if there are losses. This process continues until firms earn zero economic profit, meaning price equals average total cost.
  3. Inefficient Scale of Production: In monopolistic competition, firms operate with excess capacity because the price at which they sell their product is above their marginal cost. The price (P) is greater than the marginal cost (MC), and firms produce a quantity (Q) that is less than the output level that would minimize average cost (the efficient scale). The gap between the quantity produced and the efficient scale represents the excess capacity.
  4. Underutilization of Resources: Firms could lower their average cost by increasing production, but the price they can charge does not justify increasing output to the efficient scale. Since firms are constrained by the competitive pressure of other firms offering similar products, they cannot expand their output without losing customers to rivals.

Thus, in monopolistic competition, excess capacity refers to the fact that firms do not produce at the minimum point of their average cost curve, leading to an inefficient allocation of resources.

Criticisms of Monopolistic Competition

While monopolistic competition is often considered a more realistic model of many real-world markets than perfect competition, it is not without its criticisms. Here are some of the major criticisms:

1. Inefficiency:

One of the primary criticisms of monopolistic competition is that it leads to inefficiency. Firms in monopolistic competition do not produce at the lowest possible cost due to the presence of excess capacity. As a result, there is productive inefficiency, meaning resources are not used in the most cost-effective way. Additionally, the price is higher than marginal cost (P > MC), which leads to a deadweight loss. This inefficiency resembles that of a monopoly, where firms are not producing at the socially optimal level of output.

2. Excessive Advertising and Marketing:

In monopolistic competition, firms rely heavily on advertising and other forms of marketing to differentiate their products and attract consumers. Critics argue that this leads to wasteful spending on advertising and brand differentiation that does not necessarily improve the quality or utility of the product. Instead, advertising is often aimed at simply persuading consumers to buy one brand over another, which can be seen as a form of resource misallocation.

3. Product Differentiation May Be Superficial:

While product differentiation is a key feature of monopolistic competition, critics argue that the differences between products in these markets can be artificial or trivial. In many cases, the differences between products may not provide significant value to consumers but are primarily designed to make the product appear unique or special. This can lead to consumer confusion and market fragmentation, where consumers may end up paying higher prices for products that do not offer substantial differences from competitors.

4. Limited Long-Run Profits:

Another criticism is that monopolistic competition does not allow firms to earn long-run profits. Because firms in this structure are free to enter and exit the market, the entry of new firms erodes any economic profits that may exist in the short run, leading to zero-profit equilibrium in the long run. This lack of long-run profitability may reduce incentives for firms to innovate or improve their products in the long term, as they cannot sustain profits above the normal rate in the absence of barriers to entry.

5. Lack of Consumer Sovereignty:

In monopolistic competition, consumers may not always be making decisions based on the most objective information. Brand loyalty and product differentiation can distort consumer choices, leading them to pay higher prices for products that they perceive to be unique but that may not actually offer superior quality or value. This reduces consumer sovereignty, where consumer preferences drive market outcomes in an efficient way.

Conclusion

In summary, excess capacity arises in monopolistic competition because firms do not produce at the minimum point of their average cost curve, resulting in underutilized resources. Although monopolistic competition provides some degree of product variety and innovation, it is criticized for being inefficient, leading to excessive advertising costs, artificial differentiation, and a lack of long-run profitability. These inefficiencies and resource misallocations highlight the limitations of monopolistic competition as a market structure, especially when compared to more efficient models like perfect competition.

Subscribe on YouTube - NotesWorld

For PDF copy of Solved Assignment

Any University Assignment Solution

WhatsApp - 9113311883 (Paid)

Post a Comment

0 Comments
* Please Don't Spam Here. All the Comments are Reviewed by Admin.

Technology

close