Aristotle’s views on citizenship are fundamental to his political philosophy, as outlined primarily in his Politics. For Aristotle, citizenship is not merely a legal status but a participatory role in the political community, which he believed should be structured to promote the good life. Aristotle’s theory of citizenship is rooted in his vision of the ideal state, where citizens actively engage in deliberating and making decisions for the collective well-being. At the same time, his views have been subject to various criticisms, particularly regarding inclusivity, social hierarchy, and the practical implications of his ideas.
Aristotle's Concept of Citizenship
In Aristotle’s view, a citizen is someone who participates in the decision-making processes of the political community, particularly in governance. Citizenship, therefore, is directly tied to the practice of self-rule and the exercise of political power. In Politics, Aristotle famously distinguishes between the citizen and the resident, where the citizen is someone who has the right to participate in the judicial and legislative processes, while the resident may live within the city-state but lacks these rights. For Aristotle, the ideal citizen is not necessarily one who rules constantly but one who is capable of both ruling and being ruled in turn. This reciprocal relationship is essential for Aristotle's understanding of citizenship.
Aristotle also defines citizenship in relation to the concept of the polis, or city-state, which he considers the highest form of political organization. The polis, for Aristotle, is a community whose purpose is to enable its citizens to achieve eudaimonia, or human flourishing. He argues that the good life is attainable only within a well-ordered political community that allows citizens to realize their full potential through moral and intellectual development. Consequently, citizenship is not an individual right, but rather a collective duty to contribute to the common good and to uphold the constitution of the state.
Importantly, Aristotle’s conception of citizenship is linked to the idea of virtue. A true citizen is one who possesses the virtues necessary for participating in political life, including practical wisdom (phronesis), justice, and moderation. The active participation in governance and the pursuit of virtue are not separate; they are interdependent in Aristotle’s view. Citizenship, thus, requires moral cultivation and engagement in the affairs of the state.
Criticisms of Aristotle’s Views on Citizenship
Despite the elegance and clarity of Aristotle’s views, several criticisms have been leveled against his conception of citizenship, particularly in terms of inclusivity, equality, and practical applicability.
1. Exclusion of Women, Slaves, and Non-Greeks
One of the most significant criticisms of Aristotle’s theory of citizenship is its exclusionary nature. In Aristotle’s ideal polis, only free men who are born into citizenship are considered full citizens. This excludes women, slaves, and non-Greeks (often referred to as "barbarians") from participating in political life. Aristotle argues that women and slaves are naturally inferior and therefore unfit to participate in politics. He claims that the role of women is to manage the household, while slaves are meant to serve the needs of their masters.
This view is, of course, profoundly problematic by modern standards, as it contradicts contemporary principles of equality and human rights. The exclusion of women, slaves, and non-Greeks from citizenship undermines Aristotle’s vision of a political community aimed at promoting the good life, as it denies significant portions of the population the opportunity to participate in governance and moral development.
2. Hierarchy and Inequality
Aristotle’s political theory is based on a hierarchical view of society, where different groups have different roles and rights. This natural hierarchy, in Aristotle’s view, ensures that each individual can fulfill their proper function within the political community. However, this conception has been criticized for justifying and perpetuating inequality. By positing that certain groups, such as women and slaves, are naturally inferior, Aristotle’s theory reinforces social hierarchies that modern democratic societies reject. Critics argue that such a framework supports systemic oppression rather than promoting a just and inclusive political order.
3. Limited Scope of Citizenship
Aristotle’s model of citizenship is also criticized for being overly limited in scope. His emphasis on participation in governance, while important, excludes other forms of citizenship that may contribute to the common good. In modern political systems, citizenship is often understood in terms of civil rights, legal protections, and social obligations, not just participation in governance. Critics argue that Aristotle’s conception fails to recognize the broader dimensions of citizenship that are important in contemporary political life, such as the rights of minorities, immigrants, and marginalized groups.
4. Idealization of the Polis
Aristotle’s vision of the polis as the ideal political community is also criticized for being overly idealistic and impractical. His conception assumes that citizens will always act in the common interest and that there will be widespread virtue within the state. However, modern political theorists argue that such assumptions are unrealistic, especially in large, diverse societies where competing interests and values make collective decision-making much more complex. Critics suggest that Aristotle’s ideal polis may be more applicable to small, homogeneous communities, and that it does not account for the complexities of modern states.
Conclusion
Aristotle’s views on citizenship offer a compelling vision of political engagement and moral development, but they are not without significant flaws. His exclusionary approach to citizenship, the naturalization of inequality, and the limited scope of his political community have been subject to critique from both ancient and modern perspectives. While Aristotle’s ideas laid the foundation for much of Western political thought, they also highlight the tensions between ideal theory and the realities of a diverse, inclusive, and egalitarian society. Despite these criticisms, Aristotle’s understanding of citizenship remains a valuable starting point for discussions on political participation, virtue, and the nature of the state.
Subscribe on YouTube - NotesWorld
For PDF copy of Solved Assignment
Any University Assignment Solution
.webp)
