Critically examine Jawaharlal Nehru’s views on internationalism.

Jawaharlal Nehru's Views on Internationalism: A Critical Examination

Jawaharlal Nehru, India’s first Prime Minister, was a prominent advocate of internationalism throughout his political career. His views on international relations were shaped by his experiences in colonial India, his exposure to global political ideas, and his vision for a newly independent India. Nehru believed in a world order based on peaceful coexistence, mutual respect, and cooperation among nations, particularly in the context of the emerging Cold War and the decolonization process. However, while Nehru’s internationalism has been widely praised, it has also faced criticism, particularly with respect to its idealism, practical implementation, and alignment with geopolitical realities.

1. Nehru’s Concept of Internationalism

Nehru’s internationalism was rooted in the belief that the world should be organized on the basis of equality, justice, and non-aggression. He was a staunch critic of imperialism and colonialism, having witnessed the subjugation of India under British rule. Nehru envisioned a global system where nations, regardless of their size or power, could work together to address common challenges, such as poverty, inequality, and war. He saw the United Nations as a crucial institution for promoting peace, security, and cooperation.

Nehru’s vision of internationalism was also heavily influenced by his understanding of non-alignment. As a leader of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), Nehru advocated for countries to remain independent of the superpowers’ blocs during the Cold War, emphasizing that newly independent nations should not be forced to take sides between the United States and the Soviet Union. Nehru believed that the Cold War was a dangerous ideological conflict that could lead to nuclear war, and he called for a more cooperative and disarmament-oriented global order.

2. Principles of Peaceful Coexistence

A cornerstone of Nehru’s internationalism was the principle of peaceful coexistence, which he championed in his relationships with other nations, including China and the Soviet Union. Nehru believed that despite ideological differences, countries should coexist peacefully and engage in diplomacy to resolve conflicts rather than resort to war. He envisioned a world where global governance and multilateral cooperation would be the means to address both interstate conflict and social injustice.

In his famous speeches, Nehru argued that the world’s problems were common human challenges, such as poverty, disease, and exploitation, that required collective action. His approach to diplomacy was often idealistic, focusing on dialogue and negotiation, and emphasizing the moral authority of the newly independent nations of the Global South. He also stressed the importance of democratic values and the right of all peoples to determine their own future without external interference, advocating for self-determination and the end of colonial rule.

3. Criticisms of Nehru’s Internationalism

Despite the idealism and moral clarity of Nehru’s internationalism, several criticisms can be leveled against his approach, especially when it came to practical implementation.

a) Idealism vs. Realism

One of the key criticisms of Nehru’s internationalism was its idealism. Nehru’s faith in international cooperation and peaceful coexistence often clashed with the geopolitical realities of the Cold War and the emerging global order. While Nehru envisioned a multipolar world where countries could pursue their interests through dialogue and diplomacy, the rise of superpower rivalry between the US and the USSR created a divided world. Nehru’s insistence on non-alignment and his refusal to take sides were often seen as untenable in the face of the intensifying Cold War dynamics. Critics argue that Nehru’s idealism sometimes led to a lack of pragmatic policy in dealing with the realities of global power politics.

b) Failure in Relations with China

Another major criticism of Nehru’s internationalism is his mismanagement of India’s relations with China, particularly in the lead-up to the 1962 Sino-Indian War. Nehru’s approach to China was initially based on the principles of peaceful coexistence and he hoped for a close relationship with China, driven by shared experiences of colonialism and a commitment to Asian unity. However, his idealistic views on China were soon challenged by territorial disputes, particularly over the borders in Aksai Chin and Arunachal Pradesh. Nehru’s overconfidence in the peaceful nature of Chinese intentions led to India being caught off-guard in the 1962 war, severely damaging his credibility both domestically and internationally. Critics argue that Nehru’s internationalism, based on idealistic notions of peaceful coexistence, blinded him to the emerging challenges in the region.

c) Non-Alignment and Global Influence

While Nehru's Non-Aligned Movement was intended to give newly independent countries a voice in global affairs, critics argue that it ultimately lacked influence and often led to a moral neutrality that was ineffective in addressing pressing global conflicts. Nehru’s refusal to take sides in the Cold War conflicts meant that India was at times seen as irrelevant in the broader global geopolitical struggle. Moreover, some argue that the Non-Aligned Movement failed to achieve its primary goals of reducing tensions between the superpowers, and that Nehru’s vision of a third path often ignored the practical needs of the emerging world order.

4. Legacy of Nehru’s Internationalism

Despite these criticisms, Nehru’s internationalism left a lasting legacy in global diplomacy. His commitment to multilateralism, the peaceful settlement of disputes, and economic cooperation continues to influence India’s foreign policy to this day. Nehru’s advocacy for decolonization and self-determination for oppressed peoples helped shape the post-World War II global order, especially through his support for the newly independent nations of Africa, Asia, and the Middle East.

In the context of contemporary global politics, Nehru’s vision of a just and peaceful world order remains relevant, particularly in an era of rising nationalism and geopolitical tensions. His call for a multipolar world, grounded in dialogue, cooperation, and mutual respect, still resonates as a model for addressing the complexities of modern international relations.

Conclusion

Nehru’s views on internationalism were rooted in a deep belief in peace, equality, and global justice, but they were also shaped by idealistic aspirations that sometimes clashed with the harsh realities of global politics. While his approach laid the groundwork for India’s independent foreign policy and inspired many nations, his idealism in dealing with superpower rivalry and regional conflicts often exposed the limitations of his vision. Nonetheless, Nehru’s commitment to nonviolence, diplomacy, and the empowerment of newly independent nations remains a significant contribution to global political thought.

Subscribe on YouTube - NotesWorld

For PDF copy of Solved Assignment

Any University Assignment Solution

WhatsApp - 9113311883 (Paid)