What are Corporate Level and Business Unit level strategies? Describe the B.C.G. Model and General Electric (G.E.) planning model.

Corporate Level and Business Unit Level Strategies, BCG Model, and GE Planning Model

In strategic management, firms operate on different levels of decision-making to ensure competitiveness, sustainability, and profitability. These levels are typically categorized as corporate-level, business unit-level, and functional-level strategies. Corporate and business unit-level strategies are particularly important because they shape the direction, structure, and scope of the organization. To aid in strategic planning, models like the Boston Consulting Group (BCG) matrix and the General Electric (GE) planning model are used extensively.

Corporate-Level Strategies

Corporate-level strategy is the highest level of strategy formulation in an organization. It defines the overall mission, vision, and long-term objectives of the company and determines which business areas or markets the company should operate in. This strategy is typically designed by top management and concerns decisions about diversification, acquisitions, divestitures, strategic alliances, and allocation of resources across different business units.

There are several types of corporate-level strategies:

1. Growth Strategy: Aimed at increasing the company’s market share, revenues, or scale of operations. It may involve market penetration, market development, product development, or diversification.
2. Stability Strategy: Focuses on maintaining current operations and market position without significant expansion. Suitable in mature industries or when the market is saturated.
3. Retrenchment Strategy: Involves reducing the scale or scope of business operations to improve financial performance. This includes turnaround, divestiture, or liquidation strategies.
4. Combination Strategy: Firms may adopt a mix of growth, stability, and retrenchment strategies in different parts of their operations depending on the market conditions and performance.

The primary objective of corporate-level strategy is to maximize overall corporate value and synergy among business units, thereby ensuring long-term sustainability and shareholder wealth maximization.

Business Unit Level Strategies

Business unit-level strategy focuses on how a single business competes within its particular industry or market. Also known as competitive or strategic business unit (SBU) strategy, it addresses issues such as market segmentation, customer targeting, pricing strategies, and product positioning. These strategies are shaped by the nature of competition, customer needs, and the firm’s strengths and weaknesses.

Common business unit strategies include:

1. Cost Leadership Strategy: Aims to become the lowest-cost producer in the industry, thereby offering products at lower prices and gaining a competitive advantage.
2. Differentiation Strategy: Focuses on offering unique products or services that are valued by customers, allowing for premium pricing.
3. Focus Strategy: Targets a specific market niche by either offering low-cost products or differentiated offerings tailored to the segment’s needs.
4. Innovation Strategy: Centers on introducing new products, technologies, or services to disrupt the market or gain a first-mover advantage.

Business unit strategies are designed to achieve sustainable competitive advantage in the specific market the business unit serves. They align with the overall corporate strategy and are usually crafted by divisional heads or SBU managers.

BCG Growth-Share Matrix

The BCG (Boston Consulting Group) Matrix is a portfolio planning tool that helps corporations analyze their business units or product lines based on market growth and relative market share. It assists in identifying which SBUs should receive more investment and which should be divested.

The matrix consists of four quadrants:

1. Stars: These SBUs have high market growth and high market share. They require heavy investment to maintain growth but can generate significant returns. Over time, they can become cash cows.
2. Cash Cows: These units have low market growth but high market share. They generate more cash than they consume and are often used to fund stars and question marks.
3. Question Marks (Problem Children): These have high market growth but low market share. They require substantial investment to increase market share but may not always succeed. Strategic decision-making is critical here—whether to invest or divest.
4. Dogs: These SBUs have low market share in a low-growth market. They typically generate low returns and may be considered for divestment.

The BCG Matrix helps in resource allocation by identifying which business units to invest in, which to maintain, and which to divest. Its simplicity is one of its strengths, but it also has limitations—it relies heavily on market share and growth as indicators of potential, ignoring other factors like competitive advantage or synergies.

GE Planning Model (GE-McKinsey Matrix)

The GE Planning Model is a more comprehensive and sophisticated portfolio analysis tool compared to the BCG Matrix. It evaluates business units based on two key dimensions: industry attractiveness and business unit strength. Each SBU is rated on both axes, and the matrix is divided into nine cells.

1. Industry Attractiveness: Determined by factors such as market growth rate, market size, profitability, competitive intensity, technological change, and regulatory environment.
2. Business Unit Strength: Assessed based on market share, brand reputation, distribution network, innovation capabilities, and financial strength.

The matrix is divided into three zones:

• Invest/Grow (Top-left cells): Business units with high industry attractiveness and strong competitive positions. These should receive significant investment to grow and dominate the market.
• Selectivity/Earnings (Diagonal cells): Units with either medium attractiveness or moderate competitive strength. Management should be selective in allocating resources, focusing on enhancing competitiveness or exploiting specific market opportunities.
• Harvest/Divest (Bottom-right cells): These have low attractiveness and weak competitive positions. Strategies include harvesting, cost-cutting, or divesting the business unit.

Advantages of the GE Model over the BCG Matrix include:

• Multi-factor assessment: Rather than relying solely on growth and market share, the GE matrix includes multiple qualitative and quantitative factors.
• Strategic flexibility: It offers a more nuanced view, accommodating intermediate strategies between invest and divest.
• Better prioritization: It allows for more detailed strategic guidance and prioritization of business units.

However, it is also more complex and subjective, as many factors used to determine attractiveness and strength require qualitative judgment.

Comparison and Application of BCG and GE Models

Both models serve as valuable tools for strategic portfolio management. While the BCG matrix is simpler and more intuitive, the GE planning model offers deeper insights. Companies often use these tools in tandem to evaluate and optimize their business portfolios.

For example, a diversified conglomerate like General Electric or Tata Group, with multiple SBUs across different industries, uses such tools to allocate capital efficiently, maximize returns, and balance risk across its portfolio. They help in identifying stars to nurture, cash cows to exploit, and dogs or underperforming units to exit. These decisions support broader corporate strategies such as diversification, restructuring, or focused growth.

Conclusion

Corporate-level and business unit-level strategies are foundational to effective strategic management. Corporate strategy defines where a company wants to compete, while business unit strategy focuses on how it competes in specific markets. To support these strategic decisions, tools like the BCG Matrix and GE Planning Model provide frameworks to evaluate and manage diverse business portfolios. While the BCG matrix offers a quick and simple view based on market growth and share, the GE model provides a multidimensional approach, enhancing decision-making accuracy. When used effectively, these models enable firms to align resources with strategic priorities, sustain competitiveness, and drive long-term success.

Subscribe on YouTube - NotesWorld

For PDF copy of Solved Assignment

Any University Assignment Solution

WhatsApp - 9113311883 (Paid)