Development of the Merit System in India and the UK
I. Development of the Merit System in India
The merit system in India evolved as a reaction to colonial practices and later matured into a key pillar of democratic governance. The aim of this system has been to ensure that recruitment and promotions in public services are based on ability and qualifications, rather than personal influence, caste, or nepotism.
1. Colonial Origins
During early British rule, appointments in India were largely patronage-based, with posts given to those with connections to the East India Company. However, the growing need for efficient administration in a vast colony led to a demand for a professional and merit-based bureaucracy.
- Charter Act of 1853: Marked the beginning of competitive examinations for recruitment into the Indian Civil Service (ICS). This act ended the practice of nominations and introduced an open, competitive examination system, initially held only in London.
- Aitchison Commission (1886): Recommended classification of services and laid the foundation for Indianization of the civil services.
2. Post-Independence Reforms
After independence in 1947, India retained the civil service structure but emphasized equality and inclusion.
- Union Public Service Commission (UPSC): Created under Article 315 of the Constitution, it became the key body to conduct merit-based exams for recruitment to All India and Central Services.
- State Public Service Commissions (SPSCs): Established in each state to manage recruitment at the state level.
- Reservation Policy: While maintaining merit as a core principle, India introduced affirmative action through reservations for Scheduled Castes (SCs), Scheduled Tribes (STs), and Other Backward Classes (OBCs), balancing merit with social justice.
- Modern Reforms: Over time, reforms in examination patterns, inclusion of ethics papers, and performance-based assessments have strengthened the merit system further.
3. Current Challenges
Despite its strong foundation, India’s merit system faces issues like politicization, corruption, delays in recruitment, and debate over the impact of reservations on merit.
II. Development of the Merit System in the United Kingdom
The UK is often considered the birthplace of the modern merit-based civil service. Before reforms, British civil service posts were largely filled by aristocratic patronage, with appointments made through connections.
1. Northcote-Trevelyan Report (1854)
This landmark report laid the foundation for a professional, politically neutral, and merit-based civil service.
Key recommendations:
- Recruitment through open competitive examinations.
- Division of services into administrative, executive, and clerical classes.
- Promotions based on merit and seniority.
These ideas were progressively implemented, leading to the gradual decline of patronage.
2. Civil Service Commission (Established 1855)
Created to oversee the implementation of competitive examinations, ensuring merit-based recruitment and transparency.
3. Later Developments
- Post-WWII reforms emphasized efficiency, training, and specialization.
- The Fulton Report (1968) criticized the lack of professionalism and recommended management reforms and specialized recruitment.
- Recent changes include competency-based recruitment and performance management.
Conclusion
Both India and the UK have developed robust merit systems to promote fairness and efficiency in public service. While the UK pioneered the system, India adapted it to suit its democratic and social realities, blending merit with inclusiveness.
Subscribe on YouTube - NotesWorld
For PDF copy of Solved Assignment
Any University Assignment Solution
.webp)
