Analysis of the Powers of the Indian Parliament to Amend the Constitution
The Constitution of India, adopted in 1950, is the supreme law of the land, laying down the framework for governance, rights, duties, and the functioning of institutions. As a living document, it needs to adapt over time to social, political, and economic changes. To facilitate this, the Indian Parliament has been vested with the power to amend the Constitution. However, this power is neither absolute nor unrestricted. It is governed by specific provisions, procedures, and judicial interpretations that define the scope, limits, and nature of constitutional amendments in India.
Constitutional Provision for Amendment
The power of amendment is primarily derived from Article 368 of the Indian Constitution. Article 368 provides the procedure by which the Constitution can be amended, giving Parliament the authority to add, vary, or repeal any provision of the Constitution. However, this power is subject to certain procedural safeguards and substantive limitations.
Procedure for Amendment
Article 368 lays down the procedure for amending the Constitution, which is more rigorous than the ordinary legislative process. Amendments can be categorized broadly into three types, depending on the subject matter and the procedure involved:
- Simple Majority Amendments: Certain provisions related to the formation or abolition of legislative councils in states or the creation of new states can be amended by a simple majority of the Parliament (Article 169).
- Special Majority Amendments: Most constitutional amendments require a "special majority," i.e., a majority of the total membership of each house and a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting. This higher threshold ensures that amendments reflect broad consensus.
- Special Majority plus State Ratification: Amendments affecting federal features such as the election of the President, the powers of the Supreme Court and High Courts, the distribution of powers between the Union and States, and the representation of States in Parliament require not only the special majority in Parliament but also ratification by at least half of the state legislatures.
This multi-tiered procedure ensures a balance between rigidity and flexibility, making the Constitution amendable but only with deliberate consensus.
Scope and Extent of Amendments
The Indian Constitution is described as "neither too rigid nor too flexible," enabling it to evolve over time. Parliament has amended the Constitution over 100 times since its inception, covering a broad spectrum of issues—from fundamental rights to the structure of government.
However, the question arises: Is Parliament’s power to amend unlimited?
Judicial Interpretation and the Basic Structure Doctrine
The Supreme Court of India has played a pivotal role in defining the limits of Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution.
- Shankari Prasad (1951) and Sajjan Singh (1965): The Supreme Court initially upheld Parliament's wide power to amend any part of the Constitution, including fundamental rights.
- Golak Nath Case (1967): The Court took a restrictive view, ruling that Parliament could not amend fundamental rights as guaranteed by the Constitution. It held that amendments are laws and are subject to fundamental rights protections.
- Kesavananda Bharati Case (1973): This landmark ruling established the Basic Structure Doctrine. The Court held that Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution is not absolute and does not extend to altering the "basic structure" or essential features of the Constitution. While Parliament can amend any part of the Constitution, it cannot destroy or abrogate its core principles.
The Court did not provide an exhaustive list of what constitutes the basic structure, but it includes elements such as:
- Supremacy of the Constitution
- Republican and democratic form of government
- Secularism
- Separation of powers
- Federalism
- Judicial review
- Fundamental rights
Subsequent cases, such as Indira Gandhi v. Raj Narain (1975) and Minerva Mills (1980), reaffirmed and expanded the scope of this doctrine.
Limits Imposed by Federalism and State Participation
Another limitation on the Parliament’s power arises from India’s federal structure. Amendments affecting the distribution of powers between the Union and the States or changing the representation of States in Parliament require ratification by at least half of the State Legislatures. This ensures the protection of state interests and maintains the federal balance.
Role of the President
While the President of India is formally required to give assent to constitutional amendments, the assent is generally a formality once the amendment passes both Houses of Parliament as per Article 368. However, this assent is essential for the amendment to come into force.
Types of Amendments: Illustrative Examples
- First Amendment (1951): Introduced restrictions on freedom of speech and expression to protect public order.
- 42nd Amendment (1976): Known as the “mini-Constitution,” it made extensive changes to the Constitution, including curbing judicial review and emphasizing the Directive Principles.
- 44th Amendment (1978): Reversed many provisions of the 42nd Amendment, restoring fundamental rights.
- 73rd and 74th Amendments: Introduced provisions for Panchayati Raj and Municipal governance, strengthening local self-government.
These examples illustrate how constitutional amendments respond to changing socio-political needs.
Criticism and Safeguards
Some critics argue that Parliament has sometimes misused the amendment power to entrench political power or undermine fundamental rights. However, the judiciary has acted as a watchdog to curb such excesses through judicial review and the basic structure doctrine.
The procedural safeguards—special majority and state ratification—act as checks against hasty or partisan amendments.
Conclusion
The power of the Indian Parliament to amend the Constitution is a vital feature that ensures the adaptability and dynamism of the constitutional framework. Article 368 grants this power with a structured procedure designed to maintain stability while allowing necessary evolution.
However, this power is not unfettered. The Supreme Court’s basic structure doctrine places substantive limits on the extent of amendments, ensuring the preservation of India’s democratic ethos and constitutional identity. The federal nature of the polity further restrains arbitrary amendments by requiring state participation in certain cases.
Thus, the constitutional amendment power balances flexibility with rigidity, enabling the Constitution to remain a living document, capable of meeting the aspirations of the Indian people across time while safeguarding its core principles from erosion.
Subscribe on YouTube - NotesWorld
For PDF copy of Solved Assignment
Any University Assignment Solution
.webp)
