Appellate Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India:
The Supreme Court of India, as the apex judicial authority in the country, exercises appellate jurisdiction in both civil and criminal matters. The appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is an essential aspect of its role in the Indian legal system. The Constitution of India, under Articles 132 to 136, delineates the scope and extent of the appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.
1. Appellate Jurisdiction in Civil Matters (Article 133):
The Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction in civil matters in the following circumstances:
- Constitutional Matters: An appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court from any judgment, decree, or final order in a civil proceeding of a High Court if the High Court certifies that the case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution.
- Letters Patent: An appeal can be filed against any judgment, decree, or final order of a High Court in a civil proceeding if the High Court certifies that the case involves a substantial question of law of general importance, and in the opinion of the High Court, the said question needs to be decided by the Supreme Court.
- Civil Matters: An appeal lies to the Supreme Court from any judgment, decree, or final order in a civil proceeding of a High Court if the High Court grants a certificate of fitness for appeal to the Supreme Court.
2. Appellate Jurisdiction in Criminal Matters (Article 134):
The Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction in criminal matters in the following scenarios:
- Death Sentence Cases: An appeal shall lie to the Supreme Court from any judgment, final order, or sentence in a criminal proceeding of a High Court if the High Court has on appeal reversed an order of acquittal of an accused person and sentenced him to death.
- Certification by the High Court: An appeal can be filed if the High Court certifies that the case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution or that the case involves a substantial question of law of general importance, and in the opinion of the High Court, the said question needs to be decided by the Supreme Court.
- Special Leave to Appeal: The Supreme Court may, in its discretion, grant special leave to appeal from any judgment, final order, or sentence in any criminal proceeding of any court or tribunal in the territory of India.
3. Appellate Jurisdiction in Inter-State Disputes (Article 131):
The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction to hear and decide disputes between the Government of India and one or more States or between the Government of India and any State or States on one side and one or more other States on the other side.
4. Special Leave to Appeal (Article 136):
Under Article 136, the Supreme Court has the power to grant special leave to appeal from any judgment, decree, determination, sentence, or order in any cause or matter passed or made by any court or tribunal in the territory of India. This provision allows the Supreme Court to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction and entertain appeals in matters that may not fall under the specific appellate provisions mentioned above.
Independence of the Indian Judiciary:
The independence of the judiciary is a fundamental tenet of the Indian Constitution. The framers of the Constitution recognized the importance of a judiciary that is free from external influences and pressures, ensuring that it can act impartially and fearlessly in upholding the rule of law. The independence of the Indian judiciary is safeguarded through various constitutional provisions, practices, and conventions.
1. Appointment and Removal:
- Appointment of Judges: Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts are appointed by the President of India. The President makes these appointments after consulting with the Chief Justice of India and other senior judges.
- Collegium System: The process of judicial appointments has evolved over time, and the collegium system, which involves the Chief Justice of India and a group of senior judges, plays a crucial role in recommending appointments and elevations to the higher judiciary.
- Security of Tenure: Once appointed, judges enjoy security of tenure until they reach the retirement age. This ensures that judges are not subject to arbitrary removal or transfers, and they can adjudicate cases without fear of reprisal.
2. Financial Independence:
- Separate Fund: The salaries and allowances of judges are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India. This financial arrangement is designed to insulate judges from financial pressures and influences.
3. Immunity and Protection:
- Judicial Immunity: Judges enjoy judicial immunity, meaning that they cannot be held personally liable for their judicial actions. This immunity allows judges to make decisions based on their understanding of the law without fear of personal consequences.
- Contempt of Court: The power of the judiciary to punish for contempt of court ensures that the dignity and authority of the court are protected. However, this power is exercised judiciously to maintain a balance between free speech and the need to safeguard the institution.
4. Separation of Powers:
- Distinct Role: The Constitution ensures a clear separation of powers among the three branches of government—the legislature, the executive, and the judiciary. This separation prevents the encroachment of one branch into the domain of the others, reinforcing the independence of the judiciary.
5. Judicial Review:
- Power of Judicial Review: The Indian judiciary possesses the power of judicial review, allowing it to review the constitutionality of laws and executive actions. This power acts as a check on the legislative and executive branches, ensuring that they adhere to constitutional principles.
6. Public Trust and Accountability:
- Public Trust: The independence of the judiciary is closely linked to the trust and confidence that the public places in the institution. Judges are expected to uphold the highest standards of integrity and impartiality.
- Accountability through Inquiry: While judges enjoy independence, mechanisms for accountability are in place. In cases of misconduct or incapacity, an inquiry process can be initiated against judges through the impeachment process.
7. Judicial Activism:
- Public Interest Litigation (PIL): The Indian judiciary has, at times, demonstrated activism through PIL, allowing citizens to directly approach the court for the enforcement of fundamental rights and addressing public issues. This has been a means of ensuring justice and fairness in various social, economic, and environmental matters.
8. Judicial Training and Professionalism:
- Continuous Learning: Judges engage in continuous learning and professional development. Training programs and workshops contribute to enhancing their legal knowledge and skills, reinforcing the professionalism of the judiciary.
Conclusion:
The appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of India is a vital aspect of the country's legal system, providing a mechanism for reviewing and adjudicating cases of significance. The Constitution, through various articles, defines the scope of this jurisdiction, encompassing civil, criminal, and inter-state disputes. The independence of the Indian judiciary is a cornerstone of the constitutional framework, ensuring that the judiciary can fulfill its role as the guardian of the Constitution and protector of individual rights. The appointment process, financial autonomy, judicial immunity, and the power of judicial review collectively contribute to maintaining the judiciary's independence and its essential role in upholding the rule of law in the country.
Subscribe on YouTube - NotesWorld
For PDF copy of Solved Assignment
Any University Assignment Solution
.webp)
