Type Here to Get Search Results !

Hollywood Movies

Solved Assignment PDF

Buy NIOS Solved Assignment 2025!

Discuss the theory of suicide propounded by Darkheim.

 The theory of suicide that was propounded by Emile Durkheim is one of the most famous and influential sociological theories of the 19th and 20th centuries. This theory is known as the ‘social integration’ theory of suicide and it argues that the level of social integration that a person has with his or her society is critical in predicting the likelihood of suicide. The strength of the theory lies in its ability to explain why suicide rates vary systematically across different social groups, and its focus on the importance of social structure in understanding individual behavior.


In this essay, we will examine the theory of suicide proposed by Durkheim and evaluate its significance within the field of sociology.

Emile Durkheim’s Theory of Suicide

The French sociologist Emile Durkheim conducted a ground-breaking study on suicide in 1897, in which he sought to explain why suicide rates were higher in some social groups than in others. Durkheim’s theory argued that suicide is not an individual act, but rather a social phenomenon that is influenced by a range of social and psychological factors.

Durkheim’s theory of suicide focused on the concept of social integration, which refers to the degree to which individuals are connected to and feel a part of their society. Durkheim believed that all social groups – whether they be families, religious communities, or nation-states – require a certain level of social integration in order to function effectively. He argued that there are two types of social integration: mechanical and organic.

Mechanical solidarity describes the type of social integration that exists in traditional societies, where individuals are tightly bound together by a shared set of values, beliefs, and customs. In such societies, individuals are expected to conform to the norms of the group, and social sanctions are used to control deviant behavior. According to Durkheim, suicide rates are low in traditional societies because the strong social cohesion and collective consciousness that characterize these societies prevent individuals from feeling isolated or cut off from society.

In contrast, organic solidarity refers to the type of social integration that occurs in modern societies, where individuals are more loosely connected and are defined by their specialized roles and functions. In such societies, individuals are not as tightly bound together by shared values and norms, and there is greater tolerance for deviant behavior. Durkheim argued that suicide rates are higher in modern societies because the weaker social integration that characterizes these societies leaves individuals feeling more isolated and disconnected from society.

Durkheim identified three types of suicide that could occur: egoistic, altruistic, and anomic. Egoistic suicide occurs when an individual experiences low social integration and feels disconnected from society. This type of suicide is higher in individualistic societies where the emphasis is on personal autonomy and self-reliance. Altruistic suicide, on the other hand, occurs when an individual is too closely tied to a group or community, and is willing to sacrifice their own life for the good of the group. This type of suicide is more prevalent in collectivist societies, where the emphasis is on group loyalty and solidarity. Finally, anomic suicide occurs when an individual experiences a breakdown in social norms and values, leading to a sense of confusion or disorientation. This type of suicide is more likely to occur during times of rapid social change, such as after a major economic crisis or political upheaval.

Evaluation of Durkheim’s Theory

Durkheim’s theory of suicide has been widely debated and criticized by sociologists over the years. One criticism that has been leveled against the theory is that it is too deterministic, and does not allow for the possibility of individual agency or free will. Some critics argue that individuals are not passive pawns of their social surroundings, and that they have the ability to resist social pressures and choose their own paths in life.

Another criticism of Durkheim’s theory is that it is too broad and does not account for important variations in suicide rates across different social groups. For example, the theory does not explain why suicide rates are higher among men than women, or why suicide rates are higher among certain racial or ethnic groups.

Despite these criticisms, Durkheim’s theory of suicide remains an important contribution to the field of sociology. The theory highlights the importance of social integration in predicting suicide rates, and reminds us that individual behavior is deeply affected by the social and cultural context in which it occurs. By focusing on the relationship between social structure and individual action, Durkheim’s theory has influenced generations of sociologists and continues to inspire new research in the field.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Durkheim’s theory of suicide is an important contribution to the field of sociology, which highlights the relationship between social integration and suicide rates. The theory distinguishes between different types of social integration, including mechanical and organic, and identifies different types of suicide that can occur, including egoistic, altruistic, and anomic. While the theory has been criticized for being too deterministic and not accounting for important variations in suicide rates, it continues to be an influential framework within the field of sociology and has helped to shape our understanding of the complex interactions between social structure and individual action.

Subscribe on YouTube - NotesWorld

For PDF copy of Solved Assignment

Any University Assignment Solution

WhatsApp - 9113311883 (Paid)

Tags

Post a Comment

0 Comments
* Please Don't Spam Here. All the Comments are Reviewed by Admin.

Technology

close